Featured peer reviews
Below are a few of Peerage of Science peer reviews with high PEQ-scores, featured as examples of what good but critical peer review looks like.
As the manuscripts under review are not yet published, the manuscript title and some peer review content is censored.
Note that these peer reviews are only from the first stage of the process and therefore not Reviewer’s final judgement about the manuscript – Authors revise and improve their manuscripts after receiving the reviews (and use the PEQ scores to judge what to focus on), upload a revised version, and then the revised manuscript is given both quantitative and written final evaluation by the Reviewers.
Peer reviews are featured with permission from the reviewers.
by Dr. Richard Field, University of Nottingham, UK.
PEQ = 5.0 / 5
by PhD candidate Barbara Frei, McGill University, Canada.
PEQ = 4.9 / 5
by Dr. Sean Hoban, University of Tennessee, USA.
PEQ = 4.8 / 5
by Dr. Thomas Price, University of Liverpool, UK.
PEQ = 4.7 / 5
by Dr. Miguel Navascués, Center for Biology and Management of Populations, France.
PEQ = 4.7 / 5
by Dr. Asko Lõhmus, Tartu University, Estonia.
PEQ = 4.6 / 5
by anonymous Peer.
PEQ = 4.6 / 5
by Dr. Jenny Dunn, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK.
PEQ = 4.5 / 5
by an Associate Professor, USA.
PEQ = 4.4 / 5
by Dr. Steffen Oppel, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK.
PEQ = 4.3 / 5
by a postdoctoral researcher, France.
PEQ = 4.1 / 5
Dr. Obermeier'sSample Paper Files
You are advised to peruse these sample papers previous students have written for my classes. The papers are either pdf files or HTML files, in which I have embedded comments to explain why they are superior efforts. The comments refer to the following sentence, phrase, or word. Clicking on the comment link will bring up the content. You have to close a comment window before proceeding to the next one. Clicking on the header will give you instructions on how to make such a running header for your papers. Because of HTML restrictions, the formatting might appear slightly off. You still need to keep your papers double-spaced with 1/2-inch paragraph indent. Even if there is no specific explanation for a specific paper, the papers generally share the following superior qualities: descriptive and analytical titles; analytical theses; superior analysis of the texts; correct inclusion of quotations and formatting.
For instructions on how to do a running header for your paper in MS Word, click here.
Click on your class in the lineup.
For Engl. 250
- Paper 1 "Sheppard" Characterization
This paper has it all: outstanding thought and content, excellent organization, superior sentence structure and diction. This student's command of the language is superb. A few minor problems could have been edited out. The paper received the grade of 96/A.
- Paper 1 "Girl" Characterization
- This paper is an excellent example of superior analysis coupled with stylistic economy and succinctness that avoid anything superfluous. The introduction and organization deserve high praise. The paper received the grade of 96/A.
- Paper 2 Explication of "Sonnet 46"
- This explication of a Shakespeare sonnet is superbly done. The student outstandingly fused the analysis of the poem with an excellent and virtually error-free style. The paper received the grade of 98/A+.
- Paper 2 Explication of "Sonnet 42"
- This is a very good example of a Shakespeare sonnet explication. The student clearly understands the nuances of the sonnet, with great sections on metrical discussion. The paper received 94/A.
Here are the high-scoring essays for our assignment two. Per announcement in class, these uploads are not following the format as faithfully. I just wanted to get you the info without having to worry about getting everything lined up to MLA standards. Note also that I am providing these examples for the sophistication of the explication, the students' knowledge of technical aspects and detail of analysis; the essays, however, may still contain other weaknesses.
- Paper 3 Explication of "The Victim at Aulis"
- The student provides a superbly analyzed and written thematic poetry explication. Notice that the paper is organized around the student's thesis, ie., the major players in the myth and the poem, and not just the chronology of the paper. The paper received the grade of 98/A+.
- Paper 3 Explication of "Cassandra"
- This paper is an excellent example of a thematic poetry explication, demonstrating superb intertextual understanding and control of the primary texts. Note the student's concise and honed style. The paper received the grade of 96/A.
- Paper 4 Synthesis of Millay Poems
- This paper offers a beautiful synthesis not only of three poems but also two critical approaches: Feminist and Freudian. It is almost flawlessly written and received the grade of 98/A+.
- Paper 4 Synthesis of Mythology Poems
- The paper is up, but I am still working on the comments..
- Paper 5 Shrew Research Paper
- This is an exquisite research paper utilizing a postmodern approach to Taming of the Shrew. Notice that the critical approach is incorporated into the paper; therefore, there is no extra Barry page. The paper received 98/A+. Sorry, no comment boxes yet.
- Paper 5 Yankee Research Paper
- This is another outstanding research paper. It shows the incorporation of the research especially well. Notice that the Barry page is appended after the works cited page.The paper received 98/A+. Sorry, no comment boxes yet.
- Return to Student Resources Page
For Engl. 304
For Engl. 306
For Engl. 351
For Engl 449/559
For Engl 450/550
For Engl 451/551
For Engl 581
For Engl 650